State guide · Southeast
West Virginia subrogation law guide
The insured's fault bars recovery only if it is greater than the combined fault of all other persons responsible for the damages; otherwise damages are reduced by the insured's share. Since the 2015 reform, an insured at exactly 50% still recovers.
West Virginia at a glanceWV
- Property damage
- 2 years
- Bodily injury
- 2 years
- Fault rule
- Modified, 51% bar
- Gov. notice
- None
Overview
West Virginia changed its fault rules in 2015 and has one subrogation bar that no other state in this group shares. Under W. Va. Code 55-7-13a to 55-7-13d, an insured recovers unless its fault is greater than the combined fault of all others responsible, replacing the Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co., 163 W. Va. 332, 256 S.E.2d 879 (1979) rule that barred recovery at 50%. The same reform made liability several only, with a one-year post-judgment reallocation procedure for uncollectible shares and a 180-day window for defendants to name nonparties at fault. Property damage and personal injury both run two years under W. Va. Code 55-2-12, while written contract claims run ten years under 55-2-6, which makes contract indemnity a valuable fallback. The distinctive trap is W. Va. Code 29-12A-13(c): no claim may be presented or recovered under the right of subrogation against a political subdivision, so a county truck collision or a city water main break cannot be subrogated at all. The made-whole doctrine applies strongly unless clear policy language displaces it, and the economic loss rule bars purely economic claims without physical damage. Speed and correct target selection decide West Virginia recoveries.
Quick reference with citations
- Property damage SOL
- 2 years
- W. Va. Code 55-2-12(a) (damage to property)
- Bodily injury SOL
- 2 years
- W. Va. Code 55-2-12(b)
- Product liability
- 2 years from injury or discovery (W. Va. Code 55-2-12, with the discovery rule). No products statute of repose; claims arising from improvements to real property carry a 10-year repose (W. Va. Code 55-2-6a).
- Written contract
- 10 years
- Contract and indemnity recoveries
- Comparative fault rule
- Modified, 51% bar
- W. Va. Code 55-7-13a to 55-7-13d (2015)
- Government notice of claim
- No general statutory pre-suit notice
- No notice-of-claim requirement against political subdivisions, but W. Va. Code 29-12A-13(c) bars any claim or recovery under the right of subrogation against a political subdivision, which removes counties, cities, public service districts and similar bodies as subrogation targets. Before suing an executive-branch state agency, the claimant must give the agency's chief officer and the Attorney General written notice by certified mail at least 30 days before filing; the limitation period is tolled for 30 days (W. Va. Code 55-17-3).
Fault rule in practice
How West Virginia's rule changes a $50,000 recovery.
The insured's fault bars recovery only if it is greater than the combined fault of all other persons responsible for the damages; otherwise damages are reduced by the insured's share. Since the 2015 reform, an insured at exactly 50% still recovers.
Authority: W. Va. Code 55-7-13a to 55-7-13d (2015)
| Insured's share of fault | Recoverable in WV | Under pure comparative |
|---|---|---|
| 0% | $50,000 | $50,000 |
| 20% | $40,000 | $40,000 |
| 50% | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| 60% | Barred | $20,000 |
Doctrines that move the number
West Virginia doctrine checklist.
Made-whole doctrine
West Virginia strongly applies the made-whole doctrine: absent statutory or valid contractual terms to the contrary, the insured must be fully compensated before subrogation rights arise (Kittle v. Icard; Bush v. Richardson, 484 S.E.2d 490 (W. Va. 1997)). Clear policy or plan language can displace it (Kanawha Valley Radiologists, Inc. v. One Valley Bank, 557 S.E.2d 277 (W. Va. 2001)), and courts weigh liability, comparative fault, injury severity, future medical expense and available assets in deciding whether a settlement made the insured whole.
Economic loss doctrine
West Virginia bars negligence recovery for purely economic loss absent physical harm to person or property, a contract, or a special relationship (Aikens v. Debow). It recognizes a strict liability exception for damage to the product itself caused by a sudden, calamitous event (Capitol Fuels, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co., 382 S.E.2d 311 (W. Va. 1989)), which matters for equipment and vehicle fire subrogation.
Joint and several liability
Since 2015, liability is several only under W. Va. Code 55-7-13c, with narrow exceptions such as defendants who consciously conspire to commit the tortious act. A plaintiff may move within one year after final judgment to reallocate an uncollectible share among the other defendants by fault, but not to a defendant whose fault does not exceed the plaintiff's. Nonparty fault counts if the plaintiff settled with the nonparty or a defendant gives notice within 180 days after service (55-7-13d).
Anti-subrogation and waiver
W. Va. Code 29-12A-13(c) prohibits subrogation claims against political subdivisions, and the Supreme Court of Appeals applied it to a risk pool's recovery claim in West Virginia Counties Group Self-Insurance Risk Pool v. Great Cacapon Volunteer Fire Department. W. Va. Code 55-8-14 voids construction indemnity provisions covering the indemnitee's sole negligence.
Practice notes
Working West Virginia subrogation files.
- 1
Two years under 55-2-12 covers both property damage and bodily injury, so West Virginia closed-claim sweeps have a short window. The ten-year written contract period in 55-2-6 is the exception worth chasing: where a contractor, landlord or service vendor agreed in writing to indemnify or insure, a contract recovery can survive long after the tort claim has expired. Pull signed service agreements and leases on every commercial property loss.
- 2
Under the 2015 statute, a $45,000 fire recovery where the insured is assigned 30% of the fault returns $31,500. At 50% it returns $22,500, a result the old Bradley rule would have barred. At 51% it returns nothing. Because fault is compared with the combined fault of all others, adding a second responsible party can move a marginal file back under the bar.
- 3
Several-only liability means the defense will try to name nonparties. Section 55-7-13d gives defendants 180 days after service to give notice of nonparty fault, and settled nonparties count automatically. Sue every solvent responsible party at the outset, and calendar the one-year reallocation window after judgment in case a defendant's share proves uncollectible.
- 4
Never send a subrogation demand to a West Virginia county, city, public service district, board of education or volunteer fire department without checking W. Va. Code 29-12A-13(c), which bars subrogation claims against political subdivisions. The insured can still pursue its own uninsured losses against the subdivision. Look instead for a private contractor working for the subdivision, whose negligence remains recoverable on the ordinary two-year clock.
- 5
West Virginia applies the made-whole doctrine firmly, but clear policy language can override it. Before pressing a recovery where the insured also has uninsured losses, review the subrogation clause for priority language and document the factors West Virginia courts weigh: liability strength, comparative fault, future medical expense, injury severity and assets beyond liability coverage.
- 6
When the claim narrative names a county vehicle, municipal utility, public service district or other political subdivision as the adverse party, Ishqkala marks the opportunity as statutorily barred rather than scoring it, and searches the file for a private contractor, vendor or product manufacturer that could be the recoverable target instead. Private-party West Virginia files carry a two-year SOL alert.
Key cases
West Virginia Counties Group Self-Insurance Risk Pool, Inc. v. Great Cacapon Volunteer Fire Department
No. 19-0103 (W. Va. Nov. 4, 2020)
A risk pool that paid a county for a fire loss could not recover from the volunteer fire department because the claim was subrogation barred by W. Va. Code 29-12A-13(c). Recovery claims against West Virginia political subdivisions fail regardless of liability.
Kittle v. Icard
185 W. Va. 126, 405 S.E.2d 456 (1991)
Absent clearly expressed legislative intent, a statute granting subrogation rights does not displace the made-whole rule; equity governs how the right is exercised, and the insured must be made whole first.
Aikens v. Debow
208 W. Va. 486, 541 S.E.2d 576 (2000)
A business that lost income when a truck damaged a nearby overpass could not recover purely economic loss in negligence absent physical harm or a special relationship. Subrogated business income claims need physical damage to the insured's own property.
Inter-company arbitration
Arbitration Forums arbitrators apply West Virginia's 2015 modified comparative fault rule, so an applicant found 50% at fault still receives half of its damages, while 51% ends the claim. The 29-12A-13(c) subrogation bar applies regardless of forum, so do not file against a political subdivision or its risk pool. Compulsory jurisdiction for signatories covers company-paid damages up to $100,000. With a two-year limitation period, file promptly, since the responding company can assert an expired statute as a defense.
How Ishqkala applies this guide
WV rules, built into every score.
- Opportunities with a West Virginia loss state are calendared against the 2 years property damage period or the 2 years bodily injury period, whichever controls the claim type.
- The insured's estimated fault share is applied under modified, 51% bar before recoverable dollars are scored.
- Public-entity claims are flagged for counsel review because notice and immunity rules vary by entity.
- Alerts fire at 180, 90, 45 and 15 days before the controlling deadline.
Other modified, 51% bar jurisdictions
FAQ
West Virginia subrogation FAQ
2 years (W. Va. Code 55-2-12(a) (damage to property)). A subrogating carrier generally takes the insured's claim subject to the same limitation period, usually measured from the date of loss.
Modified, 51% bar (W. Va. Code 55-7-13a to 55-7-13d (2015)). The insured's fault bars recovery only if it is greater than the combined fault of all other persons responsible for the damages; otherwise damages are reduced by the insured's share. Since the 2015 reform, an insured at exactly 50% still recovers.
No notice-of-claim requirement against political subdivisions, but W. Va. Code 29-12A-13(c) bars any claim or recovery under the right of subrogation against a political subdivision, which removes counties, cities, public service districts and similar bodies as subrogation targets. Before suing an executive-branch state agency, the claimant must give the agency's chief officer and the Attorney General written notice by certified mail at least 30 days before filing; the limitation period is tolled for 30 days (W. Va. Code 55-17-3).
West Virginia strongly applies the made-whole doctrine: absent statutory or valid contractual terms to the contrary, the insured must be fully compensated before subrogation rights arise (Kittle v. Icard; Bush v. Richardson, 484 S.E.2d 490 (W. Va. 1997)). Clear policy or plan language can displace it (Kanawha Valley Radiologists, Inc. v. One Valley Bank, 557 S.E.2d 277 (W. Va. 2001)), and courts weigh liability, comparative fault, injury severity, future medical expense and available assets in deciding whether a settlement made the insured whole.
Find the millions hiding in your closed claim files before the Statute of Limitations expires.
We'll scan a batch of 500 closed claims for free and deliver an itemized recovery manifest within 5 business days.